Organism
First, the model of
Arc of Essentials
© applies to any
living system.
This may be an individual but also a group, an organization or a society at large. In general, such as system can have
four basic capabilities:
consciousness
,
information processing
,
physical behavior
and
communication
. If we want to understand the wat the system works,
then we at least need to understand
all of these four basic capabilities, their workings and more importantly,
their interactions.
Subjective experience
Naturally, complete reality as it surrounds us and penetrates us, will be the area to retrieve our most 'objective'
and therefore reliable information from. We do however not deal straightforwardly with that reality,
but through our (conscious)
subjective experience
.
Therefore the primary 'medium' and starting point within which we are faced with information is our everyday experience
of things, or world of experience. This is the variable content of - the conscious part of - our '
Bubble of Perception': filled with ever-changing sensations, body feelings, perceptions, memories, fantasies,
reasoning, emotions, dreams, etc..
Subjective experience takes a prominent place within the model. Logically, we see that
subjective experience
constitutes the first reference for everyone in any way. The
quality of subjective experience is beneficial
to everyone ahead in his life - or 'happiness', ranging from superficial pleasure, to deep satisfaction
or supreme ecstasy. This quality is our primary criterion that gives purpose and direction in our life and work.
The 'objective' factors play an important but only secondary, indirect role in this respect, eg as a circumstance,
means or condition.
Because subjective experience is that important, it is interesting to take a look
at its composition, content and operation. Within the entire realm of subjective experience we can distinguish two
sub-dimensions.
(a)
Content:
First there is content, the psychological and mental the elements, components or building blocks
of subjective experience. Essentially this 'raw material' of experience consists of 'loose' subjective sensations,
especially the so-called 'qualia': the aspects of experience that we perceive most immediately.
These can be ordered according to their sensory characteristics (submodalities)
such as color, shape, temperature, etc., and therefore be fairly well linked with specific neuronal areas,
functional fields and pathways in the nervous system.
(b) Structure:
Second, there are the relations between the elements, especially ordering relations. The most important are
relations of time and sequence, location and position, associative or similarity relations,
quantitative or proportional relations, and relations of reference including sign-to-meaning relations. In general,
all these relations can be reduced to derivational relations.
The relations jointly determine the structure of subjective experience. It appears to be rather difficult to
really directly map relations of subjective experience to a specific source, origin or formation cause
'on location' in the nervous system, such as neuronal areas, substances, tissues or circuits in the nervous system.
But there is a general, overall structural congruity to be discerned between the structure of subjective experience
and the structure of neuro-physical domain. Broadly seen, subjective experience at least shows a certain
reflection or an expression of the neurophysiological process of information processing, in particular
with respect to modality (somato-sensory organization), temporal aspects ie chronology
(stages of input, processing and output), and type of operation
(instantaneous experience, memory or construction).
Of these two main groups, the
content is generally the most unique, volatile, unpredictable and incalculable
- and therefore the hardest to identify, describe and predict, unless it be with use of a lot of additional information
from contextual sources, personal history, empathy and intuitive assessment. In most cases the result will be highly
subjective and personal.
The
structure however is much more widespread (universal), stable and limited in comparison to the content.
Moreover, the structure determines the relations between the parts, and thus
the composition, organization and operation of the whole: hence the saying
'the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.' In other words, the structure is much more decisive for the contents,
than vice versa. Thus, the structure is much easier to discover, describe and predict than the content.
This is especially true if we make use of reliable knowledge of relevant scientific disciplines,
such as neuro-physiology, general linguistics and formal logic.
Semantic network
In short, the subjective experience - be it on the conscious or the unconscious level - may consist of
an almost infinite variety of 'loose' elements such as sensations and experiential aspects, as well as
the relations between them, ie organization, coherence or structure.
Now it appears that the coherence of mental contents and their relations can be described in terms of a
semantic network: a network-like 'fabric' of
meanings that are interconnected
by numerous referential relations.
Once any organization appears within the subjective experience, there is a semantic network. This semantic network
thus is an immediate
derivative of subjective experience.
Next it will be clear that the semantic network of subjective experience is related to a number of major areas
and related factors within our reality.
Domain
psychology
Subjective experience is in any case largely a product or a function of
mental functioning. Our understanding of
the factors and influences that determine the subjective experience thus also stems from our concept of man,
or model of human functioning.
Psychology is the first of scientific disciplines that should offer insights
to this. But it should of course then provide a coherent, clear and balanced model of human functioning.
The most solid basis for a model of the human psychic system is primarily found in the workings of the nervous system,
therefore in
neurophysiology (including neuroanatomy). On basis of mainly material aspects
this is also related to neuropsychology, biopsychology, biology, chemistry, etc.. Concerning the more intangible aspects
that are related to information processing and behavior, we may find useful knowledge in the areas of linguistics,
social psychology,
cognitive science, and formal logic.
Within
Arc of Essentials
© a psychological model has been developed
in which tangible and intangible dimensions are integrated on grounds of the most solid scientific knowledge:
'Psychology of Subjective
Experience' ©
.
Arc of Essentials © - components Psychology.
Information
Once our experience no longer comprises only total chaos, like a diffuse gray mist of identical noise
- that is, as soon as any difference can be detected - there exists an ordering relation. Now it appears that
certain ordering patterns within this network repeat themselves relative to other patterns:
there are certain regularities
between different relations. Because of this, except for (direct) relationships,
also referential relations are possible, or meaning relations, and because of that,
information
.
In short,
information is derived from the ordering relations of the semantic network. van het semantisch netwerk.
Moreover, this network is constantly changing, being 'refreshed' with new inputs from its resources: observation,
body sensation, memory, mental processing, inference, creative construction, phantasy and imagination, etc.. Therefore,
organization and reorganization are constantly taking place. In this respect, our subjective experience
constitutes a part of the psyche as an
information processing system.
We use information to determine our choices and reactions, through continuous processes of
selection and
decision. For the most part this takes place at an unconscious level - but we can become conscious of much of it.
In short, the subjective experience has the organization of a
semantic network, the ordering relations within it
embody
information, and this provides the grounds for our
selection and
decision
on inferences, judgments and reactions.
Domain
logic
The many different processes of information processing can be traced back to an elementary process:
on basis of available data, other data can be derived - through a process, or operation, we call
reasoning.
In the end, we use the outcomes of this process to determine or to change our decisions and responses in such a way
that will as we hope render desired results. To best deal with information we therefore need to understand the
laws of information that provide guidelines by which we may reason with optimal outcomes.
The field in which information - in the sense of ordering relations - is studied in
the most accurate, thorough and universally valid way is that of
logic
.
In its most precise and powerful form this is
formal logic.
In formal logic one searches for the ultimate forms and limits of representative power (
consistency)
and decision capacity (
validity).
{Note. Actually, formal logic can be considered to be the only 'real' logic, because any other logic
would be suboptimal, satisfying to a lesser degree basic logical principles such as clarity, precision, consistency,
general validity, etc. - and if not, it belongs just as well to the same, 'real' logic.}
A well-known derivative, an application and an extension of formal logic constitutes in particular mathematics.
By far however, most of the processes and problems of reasoning, judgment and decision making with which we have to deal
in our daily life do not satisfy calculability, but they can however be optimally addressed with logic,
irrespectively of any use of arithmetic or calculation.
The exact possibilities and limits of logic are again defined in
meta-logic. From this,
there is irrefutable evidence that reliable information is actually only possible insofar as the laws of (formal) logic
are precisely followed.
Then, psychology shows that most people know very little or nothing of these laws of thought (and the facts show
that they are usually not learning about them in regular schooling, education or training,
apart from the secondary disciplines of arithmetic and mathematics). In general, people appear to heavily rely
for their reasoning on their 'intuition', which is an instinctive, half-unconscious, associative and impressionistic
manner of judgment in which emotion and imagination have free reign. This usually leads,
in particular in social judgment, to gigantic error levels in terms of prejudice, hasty judgments, irrelevancies
and all other kinds of fallacies - with absurdly much unnecessary confusion, disadvantages and damage,
that the newspapers and website blogs fill with squabble daily, and the consulting rooms of coaches and therapists
are flooding of. This may be considered strange because the basic principles of logic are just as easy to learn
as the principles of reading, writing and counting.
The logical insights and techniques that are most directly applicable for fast, sharp and sound judgments
in all possible situations, are grouped within
Arc of Essentials © under the heading of Method
'Practical Logic'
©
.
See, eg
Arc of Essentials © - components Logic.
Information application
Almost all problems and goals - big and small - are about finding causes, cues and solutions to achieve desired results.
Naturally, for this we rely on information and information processing, and thus logical reasoning.
Based on the conclusions from these processes - again, consciously or unconsciously - we convert such information
into responses eg physical responses like expressions and behaviors, through intestines, glands and muscles:
Information application
.
Determining the critical link in achieving goals and solutions firstly requires good
explanations of phenomena
- what are the
causes of a certain result? - and every good
predictions - what are the
effects
of a particular factor? This requires understanding the application of
cause and effect principles.
As soon we are facing physical and social world outside, so-called empirical reality, we are faced with
cause-effect relationships: principles of causal working, influence, control,
and hence dynamics, physics, mechanics, cybernetics, etc..
In several ways our conscious perception inevitably depends upon causality in the physical world: (1) it is affected
by forces or factors from that reality through the senses, body and nervous system; (2) it reflects in its contents
some part of that reality; and (3) it contains information that we apply to reality through explaining and predicting,
on basis of which we determine our deliberations, choices and actions.
Having knowledge of causal relations is therefore essential and indispensable in our lives.
Domain
Causality
Most causal relationships we learn about quite arbitrarily in our lives, playfully on the go as it where,
through intuitive experimentation, in a casual haphazard manner, by trial and error, hit-or-miss.
An objective understanding of causality, however, first requires a special application of logic
in areas of empirical reality. This means that the abstract results from logic have to be tailored
to fit causes and effects in real situations. Next we can use statistics in order to investigate, describe and test
causal relationships on a larger scale.
In other words, we also need a special kind of logic for applying information for practical purposes:
causal logic
.
A unique method of cause-effect analysis, tailored for practical problems, is provided within
Arc of Essentials ©
called Method of
Causal Analysis
.
See, eg
Arc of Essentials © - components of Causal Analysis.
Syntax
Information consists of abstract patterns, and these may reflect for instance the coherence in concrete physical objects
or certain clear and intense experiences. But they do not have in themselves - in essence so to speak - a specific,
recognizable shape. We can however represent information or record it in a recognizable form, using specific
codes
such as speech, writing, symbols, icons, etc.. We do this by means of a particular language, grammar or
syntax
. Through the syntax we can also deduce the information from that shape again.
The syntax provides a system - rules and 'vocabulary' - to
encrypt and
decrypt information.
We will have to follow the rules if we are to effectively display information and - for example at a later moment -
to recognize it.
Information exchange
Finally, our subjective experience largely constitutes
inter-subjective experience. That is, it consists of
'shared', 'common', or, more precisely,
symmetrical perceptions between individuals, what we usually call
mutual understanding (which also includes shared conventions, sensus communis, communis opinio, etc.)
We need this mutual understanding with others, in order to function socially or, to put it plain and simple, to survive
in society. (As the 'social monkey' that we essentially are).
Therefore, we are almost constantly engaged in collecting information from our environment,
especially our social environment, and expressing information and transferring it to others:
Information exchange
.
Domain
language & communication
Most inter-subjective 'truths' we learn through non-verbal communication, in it's most basic form designation by
simple signs, gestures and hints, or '
deiksis' (ie
deictic reference). When information
becomes more complex however, we start to use
language.
The fact is that we do lots of information collection, borrowing, capturing, expressing, transferring
and sharing with others through
language and communication
. Also, all science branches,
but especially the social sciences, depent heavily for their data collection, research, theory and knowledge development
on information exchange, both with experts and lay people (like subjects, audience, customers, etc.), and language
is an indispensable medium for this.
In communication we make use of utterances and nonverbal codes as carriers of information - but these codes and schemes
on their turn can reduce, fade or warp the original information. Thus, the syntactic surface structure
of language and expressions
is not identical with, but
refers to the semantic deep structure
which contains the real information, consisting of one piece of the semantic network that is laying underneath.
'Words are only indicators' as they refer to certain content not present in the perceivable form, and therefore we need
psychological language analysis to know exactly which content this may be.
The human language capacity in itself again affects mental processes in many aspects: eg semantic content,
concepts and perceptions, encoding and decoding, information gathering, processing and transfer.
In other words, insight and expertise with respect to language and communication are essential
for reliable information processing and judgments. The structure and function of human language systems is being studied
in general linguistics and in related areas such as general semantics (GS), psycholinguistics, etc..
Within
Arc of Essentials
© a universal and very systematic method is provided, especially for
the analysis of all forms of information in language and other symbols: Method of
'
Psychological Language analysis'
©
See, eg
Arc of Essentials © - components of Language & Communication
.
Conclusion
The above shows that psychology has in itself little to contribute to optimizing information processing,
without additional insights from fields that are more directly concerned with quality of information and representation,
like logic, causal analysis and language analysis. Ironically, the opposite does count. Ultimately psychology -
without the necessary complement - delivers a very small contribution to gain answers, solutions and results.
On the other hand, none of these disciplines such as the table shows, offers in itself sufficient tools for an optimal
information processing and judgment: each plays an important and crucial role in these processes.
It is therefore essential that we understand the interconnectedness of laws, mechanisms and processes
related to information processing and judgments. Precisely this interconnectedness is clearly and systematically
mapped within
Arc of Essentials
© through a series of related models and methods
for data and judgments (see the summary,
Matrix of Dimensions and Main Components of Arc of Essentials
©
).
In addition,
Arc of Essentials
© offers adequate solutions and additional extras
for various problems and shortcomings in these areas:
Solutions and Extras of
Arc of Essentials ©
.